<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Psychoanalytic Field</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com</link>
	<description>explorations - theories - techniques</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 18:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>3, 4, 2</title>
		<link>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/08/18/3-4-2/</link>
		<comments>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/08/18/3-4-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fadi Abou-Rihan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Found Object]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Play]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Subjects]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Transitionals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Winnicott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psafield.wordpress.com/?p=180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;In the early 1950’s, Winnicott had identified the transitional (object, phenomenon, and space) as the bridge between the inner (life) and the outer (reality) that the subject must set up and continually cross if it is to pursue its developmental journey and reach its full potential as subject.  Twenty years later, Winnicott declared that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/08/18/3-4-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
	
		<media:content url="http://psafield.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/1.jpeg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://psafield.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/2.jpeg" medium="image" />

		<media:content url="http://psafield.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/3.jpeg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>other-than-me, more-than-me, other-than-mine</title>
		<link>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/08/04/other-than-me-more-than-me-other-than-mine/</link>
		<comments>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/08/04/other-than-me-more-than-me-other-than-mine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 02:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fadi Abou-Rihan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Displacement]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Fetish]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Found Object]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Play]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Productions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Speaking Desire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Subjects]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Transitionals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Winnicott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psafield.wordpress.com/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;Of the found object’s various Winnicottian features, three are crucial for it to qualify as found.  First, it must possess a modicum of vitality evidenced through warmth, movement, or texture for instance.  Second, it has to be resilient enough to survive the loving and/or aggressive manipulations of the individual that finds it, with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/08/04/other-than-me-more-than-me-other-than-mine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Found</title>
		<link>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/07/29/found/</link>
		<comments>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/07/29/found/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fadi Abou-Rihan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Found Object]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Play]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Productions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Speaking Desire]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Subjects]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Transitionals]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Winnicott]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psafield.wordpress.com/?p=92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;This post is the first in a series that finds its point of departure in the activity Winnicott terms play, the activity that unfolds between child and “found” object.  My premise is that this activity is not an event that the detached and adult Winnicott has merely observed in his young charges; it is [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/07/29/found/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Work - 3</title>
		<link>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/05/01/work-3/</link>
		<comments>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/05/01/work-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 02:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fadi Abou-Rihan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Dreams]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Freud]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Machines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Play]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Productions]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psafield.wordpress.com/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;it seems to me that the roots of the psychoanalytic distinction between work and play can be traced back to Freud&#8217;s two principles of mental functioning (reality and pleasure) that regulate the workings of, respectively, the conscious and the unconscious.  Work is presumably part of a cluster that includes reality, survival, and efficiency while [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/05/01/work-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Work - 2</title>
		<link>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/04/29/work-2/</link>
		<comments>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/04/29/work-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fadi Abou-Rihan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Freud]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Klein]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lacan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Machines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MetaTherapeutics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Play]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Re-Parenting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Winnicott]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psafield.wordpress.com/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;The following is partly in response to Ktismatics&#8217; comments on a recent post.
&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;The method of free association was Freud’s response to one of the most challenging tasks with which psychoanalysis has had to grapple over its history: the elaboration of a system of contact, traversal, and translation between the primary and secondary processes as two [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/04/29/work-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Work</title>
		<link>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/04/26/work/</link>
		<comments>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/04/26/work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fadi Abou-Rihan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Dreams]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Freud]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Machines]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MetaTherapeutics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Re-Parenting]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Repetition]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Schizoanalysis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Work]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psafield.wordpress.com/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;Freud grounded psychoanalysis in terms of a collaborative uncovering of the unconscious as dynamic and over-determined.  That such uncovering occurs in a fraction of the time “psychoanalysis” occupies or that it necessitates much preparation does not deny it its status as the core and defining element of the practice; if anything, it reinforces it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/04/26/work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Of Revisions and Caricatures</title>
		<link>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/04/19/of-revisions-and-caricatures/</link>
		<comments>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/04/19/of-revisions-and-caricatures/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 16:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fadi Abou-Rihan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Dreams]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Freud]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Klein]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Lacan]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Laughter]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MetaTherapeutics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Secondary Revision]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Speaking Desire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psafield.wordpress.com/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;Freud argued in Totem and Taboo that the efects of secondary revision are not exclusive to the dream-work; they are in fact evidenced in any realm of thought that requires unity and intelligibility as markers of its systematic aspirations.  Freud writes:
The secondary revision of the product of the dream-work is an admirable example of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/04/19/of-revisions-and-caricatures/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Antigone</title>
		<link>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/04/08/antigone/</link>
		<comments>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/04/08/antigone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 14:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fadi Abou-Rihan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Anouilh]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Antigone]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Laughter]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Oedipus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Repetition]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sophocles]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psafield.wordpress.com/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;The generally held view, the one that psychoanalysis has recapitulated but not yet fully explored, is that the kernel of the Sophoclean script treats of a three-sided violation: Oedipus was doomed as much for his attempt at defying the Delphic oracle as he was for his parricide and incest.  The latter were of a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/04/08/antigone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why no longer?</title>
		<link>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/04/03/why-no-longer/</link>
		<comments>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/04/03/why-no-longer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 13:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fadi Abou-Rihan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[History]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Mourning]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Repetition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psafield.wordpress.com/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(This review is forthcoming in the fall issue of Symposium)
&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;In his most recent book, Jay Lampert leads us back to one of Deleuze and Guattari’s most complex philosophical expositions of time and repetition without fuss or fanfare. He weaves for us an account of history that is both rich and concise. In a wonderfully honest [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/04/03/why-no-longer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Freud&#8217;s Oedipal Bind-2</title>
		<link>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/03/30/freuds-oedipal-bind-2/</link>
		<comments>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/03/30/freuds-oedipal-bind-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2008 17:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fadi Abou-Rihan</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Double Bind]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Freud]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[MetaTherapeutics]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Oedipus]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Sophocles]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Speaking Desire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://psafield.wordpress.com/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;In one sense at least, and as far as Oedipus is concerned, Freud could not have been any more inconsistent for having remained silent about a presumably blinding truth while advocating speech as the principal instrument of insight.
&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;There is nothing triumphal about such an observation since Freud’s was not a logical inconsistency, let alone a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://thepsychoanalyticfield.com/2008/03/30/freuds-oedipal-bind-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>